The Ethics of Infant Male Circumcision: Brian Earp

In this talk, I argue that the non-therapeutic circumcision of infant males is unethical, whether it is performed for reasons of obtaining possible future health benefits, for reasons of cultural transmission, or for reasons of perceived religious obligation.

Added by LucidFir http://pastebin.com/AF9RJg1m

  1.  
  2. Points of interest:
  3.  
  4. Circumcision confers no health benefits:
  5.  
  6. Circumcision kills hundreds outright, annually… nulling the health benefits even if they were real:
  7.  
  8. Circumcision is deeply harmful to sexual function:
  9.  
  10. Circumcision is deeply harmful psychologically:
  11.  
  12. Circumcision is perpetuated for profit:
  13.  
  14. Circumcision is horrific (very upsetting links):
  15.  
  16. Circumcision is genital mutilation (comparison with female genital cutting):
  17.  
  18. Circumcision is not necessary for religion:
  19.  
  20. Circumcision creates denial:
Health
The New Story Revolution
Trending Videos Explore All
Trending Articles Explore All
Recent Documentaries
Video Deep Dives
What People Are Watching Now
Corporations
Our mission is to support the people and movements creating a more free, regenerative and democratic society. 



Subscribe for $5/mo to support us and watch over 50 patron-exclusive documentaries.

Share this: