From the earliest days of the Gaza conflict, a pattern emerged in Western media coverage: unverified claims repeated as fact, protest movements reduced to caricature, and political slogans stripped of context to justify their suppression. This short piece from Double Down News walks through several of the most persistent distortions — from inflated atrocity stories that shaped early public perception, to the reflexive framing of pro-Palestinian demonstrations as antisemitic, to the deliberate misreading of phrases like "from the river to the sea." Each example points to the same underlying question: whose interests are served when media narratives go unexamined, and what happens to democratic discourse when they do?
Join the Future of Journalism ► https://www.patreon.com/DoubleDownNews