Jan 29, 2020
5 min read

Voting Is a Chess Move, Not the Whole Game

"Voting is a chess move, not a valentine. And here's the joy of being politically engaged all year round every year; you get to work with a whole lot of chess pieces and players and strategies and longterm visions, so you don't agonize over whether this little hop with a pawn we call voting defines you. You get to define yourself by what you're passionately committed to, by who you align with, by your dreams and your visions, you get to move a lot of pieces a lot of times, you get heroic allies, and you play to win above, beyond, around elections. But you vote, because you know it matters too." - Rebecca Solnit
By Tim Hjersted / filmsforaction.org
Voting Is a Chess Move, Not the Whole Game

Vote‬ defensively.

Vote offensively.

Vote when there is someone worth voting for.

Vote for or against ballot measures.

Vote locally where we have more agency over the outcomes.

Reject ideology promoted by the ruling class. Not voting says nothing to the ruling elite. It doesn't threaten their legitimacy. They don't care if you don't vote. They don't care if 90% of us don't vote. 40-60% already don't. And that's exactly what they want.

Meanwhile, Republicans and establishment Democrats run candidates, hire lobbyists, fund think tanks, write bills, lobby those bills, fund media operations, organize and mobilize their base to vote, get their reps elected, and ultimately, they get the government that they worked for. 

They make the rules. They pass the bills in the statehouses. They obstruct in congress. They elect activist far-right judges. And they focus on local and state elections while we spend most of our time focusing on presidential ones.

Government makes a difference for them. It works great for them! They own this country because they have seized the levers of government for themselves. 

Watch this excellent spotlight on ALEC and state-legislatures to really get a sense for where these private interests are putting their efforts:

 

 

Meanwhile, the left and the apolitical (who largely support progressive policies) in large swathes believe voting is pointless and abstains from the realms of politics altogether, as if that's the moral, rational, radical or educated thing to do, then observes for another 2-4 years how poorly the government works for them.

If that's been you in the past, hey, no disrespect! I get it. Why invest energy into something that seems hell-bent on foiling your efforts at every turn?

It's true, the government has worked more for neoliberal Republicans and Democrats for more than half a century. Most of us are too young to remember a time when the government was responsive to ordinary people, and an honest reading of history shows that elections have never been truly democratic or truly responsive to all segments of the public - hello somebody!

But when women and African Americans didn't even have the right to vote, did they say, "Hey, voting has never done anything for us in the past! Why even bother? Why invest energy in gaining the right to vote when it's clearly pointless. The game is rigged! We should probably just put our attention elsewhere..."

Apply any argument for not voting today to a time when people couldn't vote at all, and it seems clear that the answer isn't to concede defeat. It's to fight!

If there is an institution in the world that has the power and legal authority of an established police, court, prison & military system, the people should have control over that system.

Full stop.

Change it or alter it to make it more humane of course, but to do that the public has to have control over those systems (from without and from within).

Most of these systems are staffed by ordinary people who are doing their best, based on how they were raised and educated. These systems are not monolithic, and the shared ideology and consensus that holds the current system together is weaker today than ever.

Many in the government would probably like to improve things as well but have little agency by themselves. Like most employees in a company, their power remains mostly latent as individuals but is powerful when part of an organized union, supported by civic and political organizations on the outside. Whatever room they have to change things at an individual level is bolstered by having an engaged public driving those changes.

This is as true for the presidency as it is for a city commissioner or board of education rep.

---

Now, for those who would object to my argument being too partisan, I'm not saying the Democrats that run for office aren't a part of the problem.

My point is that we, as the public, who are more progressive, don't engage.

Too many honest progressives and radicals (folks that aren't centrist right-leaning Dems) don't believe in running for offices of government. Because of the way we've been socialized to view politics, a majority of progressive people don't want to get involved. And so the people who are happy to take that power are the ones who get it.

But maybe with the enthusiasm that Bernie Sanders brought back to politics in 2016, and AOC and many others brought in 2018, we can turn this ship around.

We need to get real progressives in every local position of government from the bottom up. Whatever party we use as a vehicle for change, we need to build power first at the local level, where we have the most agency to affect the outcome.

If Republicans, establishment Democrats and the corporations that fund them can make government work for them, I'm pretty damn well sure we can make it work for us.

We just need to start doing what the movement for Bernie Sanders is doing, and that starts with ending this debilitating allergy to political engagement.

 

Question: “How can you vote?  With all you’ve done and written, how can you participate in this corrupt, money-driven system?  I thought you were far more radical than that!”

"Political strategies and tactics are not jealous lovers. You don’t have to be monogamous. Direct Action will not feel betrayed if you also vote from time to time—you can be poly in your tactics.  And I am.  Of course I vote!  If you’re a woman, or a person of color, or a person who doesn’t own property, or even a white male who doesn’t belong to the nobility, centuries of struggle and many deaths have bought you the right to vote.  I vote to keep faith with peasant rebels and suffragist hunger strikers and civil rights workers braving the lynch mobs of the South, if for no other reason.  But there is another reason—because who we vote for has an enormous impact on real peoples’ lives." - Starhawk

 

Want a little more inspiration?

Here are a collection of articles from the Films For Action library on voting, democracy, direct action, and holistic, long-term visions and strategies for change:

 

 

Tim Hjersted is the co-founder and director of Films For Action, a people-powered library for social change.

Films For Action was formed by a few friends from Lawrence, Kansas in 2006 in response to a fundamental critique of our highly consolidated, for-profit media system. We believe a healthy media ecosystem is essential to a healthy democracy.

This work is licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
BECOME A PATRON
For $5/mo or $51/year, dive deeper with 50 exclusive films hand-picked to empower your activism. Subscribe here.
More by Tim Hjersted
Politics Explore All
Articles by Tim Hjersted
Trending Videos Explore All
Trending Articles Explore All
Recent Documentaries Explore All
Video Deep Dives Explore All
What People Are Watching Now
Transition Stories for Becoming a Global Eco-Civilization
Support independent media for a more free, regenerative and democratic society. 



Subscribe for $5/month to support us and watch over 50 patron-exclusive documentaries.

Share this:

Share