Gold Vs Paper Based Financial System visualized

Gold VS paper-based financial system

Warren Buffett once famously chided that all the gold in the world would form a cube of 67 feet (20 meters) on each side.

In doing so, he was attempting to argue that there was no point in owning gold since all the gold in the world would be an unproductive, useless hunk of metal.

What's ironic (and completely lost on the venerable Mr. Buffett) is that you could make the same argument about the paper-based financial system.

It's estimated that the derivatives market now exceeds $1 QUADRILLION (15 zeros) in notional value.

If you were to somehow accumulate and stack up $1 quadrillion, the pile would be thousands of feet high and hundreds of yards long... much bigger than the cube of gold.

It's a similar story with government debt, which exceeds $56 trillion worldwide.

Now, it may be a cute thought experiment to blast gold as a useless hunk of metal.

But the reality is that gold will never require a taxpayer-funded bailout. It won't crash the financial system. And it won't enslave future generations to higher taxes and inflation.

On the balance, at least as a means of preserving assets over the long-run, 'useless' certainly beats 'destructive'.