We don't run on ads. We run on donations. Please help us by committing $5 a month.

Bernie Sanders Will Tie Biden in the Final Super Tuesday Results: Why It Looks Good for Sanders

Biden’s current lead (566-501) which is being advertised by the media does not include the full vote count and allocation of states that Sanders handily won – Colorado, Utah and California (though Vermont is complete). 188 delegates from California alone are yet to be allocated. With these delegates fully assigned, expect the delegate race to be closely tied.
By Saib Bilaval /
Mar 4, 2020
Bernie Sanders Will Tie Biden in the Final Super Tuesday Results: Why It Looks Good for Sanders

Regardless of how the corporate media is portraying Super Tuesday, the Sanders candidacy has only suffered a minor setback.

The statistics are still encouraging. With Warren flopping and reported considering dropping out, Sanders expects a more comfortable race, based on binaries drawn by him – unlike Warren playing spoiler to Bernie in many states earlier. His tougher states are now more likely to be neck and neck. With Bloomberg dropping out, the race is now officially Biden vs Sanders.

Sanders now gets to share the debate stage alone with Biden, giving him ample time to go one-on-one vs Biden over the latter’s rather bad record. It also gives him the space to win over mainstream voters. The last debate had 6 candidates, and most had 10, giving candidates between 13-17 minutes of speaking time. This will now be in hours. Sanders can also demonstrate how much sharper he is than Biden (who can no longer function without a teleprompter or written speeches), as well as neutralize attacks and unfair characterizations of him in detail.

Sanders has also started running negative ads on Biden’s policy record, and indicated a willingness to go on the attack. He has also started spelling out his electability argument in greater detail. Now, the only candidate he has to draw contrasts with is Biden. Their bases are so far apart, other than African American voters which they both share (though not inter-generationally), that Sanders can undo his own weaknesses by attacking Biden’s strengths.

Biden’s record on trade deals can make his appeal to white swing state working class voters and union members take a hit. Sanders’ shining a light on Biden’s attempts to pass cuts on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security has already made him take a hit with older voters, regardless of color. Biden’s prime role in the writing of the Crime Bill and marijuana can make him suffer with African-American voters, both young and old. His vote on repealing Glass Steagall, on the Iraq War, on the Defence of Marriage Act, Welfare Reform and the Bankruptcy bill (which devastated millions especially single moms and prevented bankruptcy filing for those with medical or student debt) will make it clear who Biden stands with.

Then, of course, is the base Sanders already has in spades – Latino voters of all ages, progressives, liberals, young voters of all color, LQBTQIA+ voters. The toss up remains union voters, working class voters, suburban voters, rural voters, and white women. Sanders has only bases to gain, and Biden only has bases to lose, given the polarization today.

There is also good evidence that a two-person race might actually help Sanders. Exit polls show the way – a majority of voters in every single state that has voted so far support Medicare for All, higher minimum wage, free college and a Green New Deal, and sees Sanders as far more trustworthy on the economy, trade, healthcare, jobs, the environment, and even in defeating Trump!  Sanders is clearly the far better suited candidate to enact these changes, given that they are his platform, as compared to Biden who has openly spoken out against these, and only has the myth of electability going for him. The “vaguely progressive candidates” are all out of the race. Sanders also has a far higher approval rating than Biden ever had in his career. The spotlight can only harm Biden, not help him.

Biden himself will undergo closer media scrutiny, and the Republican will also train their guns fully on him. Biden’s declining cognitive health has been spun till now by the media as gaffes – but now they will be seen as fully liabilities.

He mixed up his sister and his wife in person at a rally recently, referred to Bernie as President Sanders, called himself a candidate for US Senate, forgot Obama’s name, claimed that he would appoint the first African American woman to the US Senate (there have already been African American women in the US Senate, and Presidents cannot appoint Senators – a Supreme Court nomination would have been a more accurate fit), mixed up states, forgot the Constitution, called Chris Wallace “Chuck”, incorrectly claimed that gun violence was responsible for 150 million death (it was 150,000) – the barriers Biden will face ahead are formidable indeed and of his own making.

Biden’s current lead (566-501) which is being advertised by the media does not include the full vote count and allocation of states that Sanders handily won – Colorado, Utah and California (though Vermont is complete). 188 delegates from California alone are yet to be allocated. With these delegates fully assigned, expect the delegate race to be closely tied.

Biden only has a 65 delegate lead with partial results. For context, that’s less than half of the total delegates at play in Ohio (or Illinois or Michigan or New Jersey) alone, 1/3rd of delegates at stake in New York, Florida or Pennsylvania – not a large gap at all. The primary has only just stated, and a majority of states are yet to vote. Several of those are strongly Sanders-leaning states such as Washington, Oregon, Wisconsin, Alaska, Illinois, Puerto Rico, Ohio, Hawaii, West Virginia, Oregon and Kentucky. A 60 vote lead (which will be smaller after the full declaration of Super Tuesday results) can be overcome even without any big wins – which will of course happen.

Sanders will have to make full use of his social media machinery, surrogates, donor base, organizational machinery and massive volunteer base if he is to win the subsequent battles – and he seems to be doing precisely that.

And so the media is wrong – the Sanders campaign is hardly “destroyed”, and if anything, it has only been reinforced by the binary patterns in voting. Sanders can very well attempt to make the most of the situation, back as an insurgent against a flawed candidate while Biden will have to struggle to maintain his position.


The author is a PhD research scholar in Modern and Contemporary History at Centre for Historical Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University

Trending Videos
Media Literacy
Documentaries by Peter Charles Downey
Short Films
Featured Documentaries

Films For Action is a library for people who want to change the world.

Founded in 2006, our mission is to provide citizens with the knowledge and perspectives essential to creating a more beautiful, just, sustainable, and democratic society.

  • To dive in, click the Explore button above. You can filter by subject and category at the same time, and sort by newest, most viewed and top-rated.
  • Help us keep the quality of the site high by rating content 1-5 stars.
  • Add videos to our library! Half of our best content was added by members.
  • Have a question or suggestion? Feel free to get in touch.
  • Want to support us and watch some great films in the process? Our $5/mo Patrons get access to 15 of our favorite documentaries.


Why join Films For Action?

Goal: To rapidly transition to a just, ecologically sustainable, holistic way of living as fast as possible.

We believe the first step to achieve this goal should be an information delivery network that can amplify the impacts of all our efforts 1000 fold. 

Although Films For Action is centered around film - its true objective is the transformation of the world. This means moving away from the unsustainable paradigm we have now to a regenerative paradigm, as fast as humanly possible.  

Film is the medium of delivery -- the catalyst, the metabolizing agent to speed up, amplify and multiply the effects of every transition movement on the planet. And of course, "transition" contains it all - social justice, ecological regeneration, true democracy, egalitarian economics, universal empathy, less cultural insanity and more happiness and well-being.

All of these movements need a media ecosystem that supports this transition, rather than the media we have today which marginalizes it, ignores it, sanitizes it, suppresses it, or actively fights it. There is certainly good coverage across many different news outlets, and the quality and depth varies, but in terms of volume, the good stuff is easily lost in the deluge of superficial concerns.

Watch any network TV channel for 24 hours or read the newspaper for a week, and you will see what we mean. The dominant narratives which drive the national debate and become "common knowledge" is more often superficial, focused on symptoms rather than root causes, and reinforces the conventional "two sides" within the status quo. The lies and spin promoted by figures in power become well known, while voices that challenge and expand the range of debate rarely get heard. But most importantly, the level of repetition and volume of coverage is what counts. What gets covered day after day, and what gets covered once and is forgotten, or not covered at all? That's why we need a media movement that's dedicated to elevating the voices that aren't getting heard. We need media alternatives that make social change its primary focus. That's why Films For Action exists.

Ultimately, we're just one star in this growing constellation of new media, but we aim to do our part by cultivating the best video library dedicated to transition online, and we hope you'll join us