The Ethics of Infant Male Circumcision: Brian Earp

50%

In this talk, I argue that the non-therapeutic circumcision of infant males is unethical, whether it is performed for reasons of obtaining possible future health benefits, for reasons of cultural transmission, or for reasons of perceived religious obligation.

Added by LucidFir http://pastebin.com/AF9RJg1m

  1.  
  2. Points of interest:
  3.  
  4. Circumcision confers no health benefits:
  5.  
  6. Circumcision kills hundreds outright, annually… nulling the health benefits even if they were real:
  7.  
  8. Circumcision is deeply harmful to sexual function:
  9.  
  10. Circumcision is deeply harmful psychologically:
  11.  
  12. Circumcision is perpetuated for profit:
  13.  
  14. Circumcision is horrific (very upsetting links):
  15.  
  16. Circumcision is genital mutilation (comparison with female genital cutting):
  17.  
  18. Circumcision is not necessary for religion:
  19.  
  20. Circumcision creates denial:
Activism   Health   Human Rights
Health
Recently Added
Documentaries by One of Our Heroes, John Pilger (Rest in Peace)
Patron Documentaries
Subscribe for $5/mo to watch over 50 patron-exclusive films
Trending Videos Explore All
Trending Articles Explore All
Films for a Wiser Earth
Our mission is to support the people and movements creating a more free, regenerative and democratic society. 



Subscribe for $5/mo to support us and watch over 50 patron-exclusive documentaries.

Share this: