Wikileaks Exposes Secret Deal to Get Saudi Arabia on UN Human Rights Council
Wikileaks Exposes Secret Deal to Get Saudi Arabia on UN Human Rights Council
By Michaela Whitton / theantimedia.org
Oct 5, 2015

Two years after the controversial appointment of Saudi Arabia to the UN Human Rights Council, leaked diplomatic cables have revealed the UK was a key player in the election of the Gulf State ─ despite the Saudis’ appalling human rights record.

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHCR) is tasked with the promotion and protection of human rights throughout the world. What’s remarkably under-reported (yet unsurprising) is the claim that notorious human rights abuser, Saudi Arabia, pledged $1 million to UNHRC prior to winning the blood-stained seat.

What is surprising is the next chapter in the farcical saga.

In a classic case of you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours, the leaked cables ─ translated by UN Watch ─  allege that a secret vote trading deal was made by Britain and Saudi Arabia to ensure both countries were elected to the council.

Passed to Wikileaks in June, the classified files refer to Saudi talks with British diplomats prior to the November 2013 vote in New York.

One read“The delegation is honoured to send to the ministry the enclosed memorandum, which the delegation has received from the permanent mission of the United Kingdom asking it for the support and backing of the candidacy of their country to the membership of the human rights council (HRC) for the period 2014-2016, in the elections that will take place in 2013 in the city of New York.”

The leaked files then elaborate on the trading of “support” between the two countries:

The ministry might find it an opportunity to exchange support with the United Kingdom, where the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would support the candidacy of the United Kingdom to the membership of the council for the period 2014-2015 in exchange for the support of the United Kingdom to the candidacy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.”

Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, said“Based on the evidence, we remain deeply concerned that the UK may have contracted to elect the world’s most misogynistic regime as a world judge of human rights.” The latest glimpse into Britain’s shoulder-rubbing with prolific human rights violators was revealed as the Saudi kingdom pummels Yemen for the sixth month and Saudi blogger Raif Badawi languishes behind bars for writing about democracy.

As the kingdom that has beheaded over 100 people this year prepares to crucify a 17-year-old for taking part in demonstrations, Britain’s insincere boasting about being a strong promoter of human rights sounds more hollow than ever.

4.6 ·
4
Trending Today
On the Wildness of Children: The Revolution Will Not Take Place In The Classroom
Carol Black10,763 views today ·
Paramedic's Response to "Burger Flippers" Making an Equal $15/Hour is Beautiful
Craig Carilli6,566 views today ·
Caitlin Moran's Posthumous Advice for Her Daughter
Caitlin Moran5,630 views today ·
I Promise, It's Not Lame to Ask a Woman for Permission
Dave Booda5,063 views today ·
What Makes Call-Out Culture So Toxic
Asam Ahmad2,432 views today ·
The Top 100 Documentaries We Can Use to Change the World
Films For Action2,376 views today ·
Argentina: The Country That Monsanto Poisoned
Michael Warren and Natacha Pisarenko2,086 views today ·
The Revolution Is Acceptance
David Heaps1,986 views today ·
I Know Islamic State. What They Fear More Than Bombs Is Unity
Nicolas Hénin1,841 views today ·
Load More
What's Next
Miss Representation (2011)
90 min
Gaza One Year On
3 min
Crisis in the Congo: 7 Million Dead and the Role the US and its Allies Played
26 min
Like us on Facebook?
Wikileaks Exposes Secret Deal to Get Saudi Arabia on UN Human Rights Council