We're Making a Mistake If We Let a Mass Slaughter Become a Debate about Cartoons
We're Making a Mistake If We Let a Mass Slaughter Become a Debate about Cartoons
By Ezra Klein / vox.com
Jan 8, 2015

Yes, Charlie Hebdo was a magazine that delighted in controversy and provocation. Yes, it skewered religion and took joy in giving offense. Yes, the magazine knowingly antagonized extremists — Charlie Hebdo's web site had been hacked and its offices firebombed before today; French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius had asked of its cartoons, "Is it really sensible or intelligent to pour oil on the fire?" And yes, Charlie Hebdo's editor said in 2012, prophetically, that "I prefer to die than live like a rat."

But this isn't about Charlie Hebdo's cartoons, any more than a rape is about what the victim is wearing, or a murder is about where the victim was walking.

What happened today, according to current reports, is that two men went on a killing spree. Their killing spree, like most killing sprees, will have some thin rationale. Even the worst villains believe themselves to be heroes. But in truth, it was unprovoked slaughter. The fault lies with no one but them and their accomplices. Their crime isn't explained by cartoons or religion. Plenty of people read Charlie Hebdo's cartoons and managed to avoid responding with mass murder. Plenty of people follow all sorts of religions and somehow get through the day without racking up a body count. The answers to what happened today won't be found in Charlie Hebdo's pages. They can only be found in the murderers' sick minds.

Today is a good day to honor Charlie Hebdo and to share its work. It's a good day to do that because good people died today and we should remember them. It's a good day to do that because much of the work in Charle Hebdo was brilliant and any day is a good day to share it.

Don't allow extremists to set the terms of the conversation

 

 

But we shouldn't buy into the bullshit narrative of a few madmen that their murders were a response to some cartoons. We shouldn't buy into it even if we're saying that murdering in response to cartoons is always wrong. This is related to a point Charlie Hebdo made often and well. As my colleague Max Fisher wrote about the magazine's wonderful cover, "Love is Stronger Than Hate" (pictured above):

Part of Charlie Hebdo's point was that respecting these taboos strengthens their censorial power. Worse, allowing extremists to set the limits of conversation validates and entrenches the extremists' premises: that free speech and religion are inherently at odds (they are not), and that there is some civilizational conflict between Islam and the West (there isn't).

These are also arguments, by the way, made by Islamophobes and racists, particularly in France, where hatred of Muslim immigrants from north and west Africa is a serious problem.

And that is exactly why Charlie Hebdo's "Love is stronger than hate" cover so well captures the magazine's oft-misunderstood mission and message. Yes, the slobbery kiss between two men is surely meant to get under the skin of any conservative Muslims who are also homophobic, but so too is it an attack on the idea that Muslims or Islam are the enemy, rather than extremism and intolerance.

Allowing extremists to set the limits of conversation validates and entrenches the extremists' premises. That was true in the criticism of Charlie Hebdo's covers, and it's even truer in today's crimes.

These murders can't be explained by a close read of an editorial product, and they needn't be condemned on free speech grounds. They can only be explained by the madness of the perpetrators, who did something horrible and evil that almost no human beings anywhere ever do, and the condemnation doesn't need to be any more complex than saying unprovoked mass slaughter is wrong.

This is a tragedy. It is a crime. It is not a statement, or a controversy.

 

3.5 ·
4
Related Films
It's Hard to Be Loved by jerks (2008)
103 min Charlie Hebdo is a satirical news magazine published weekly in France; the magazine has a richly earned reputation for confronting authority in all forms, but in 2006 they...
Trending Today
What Makes Call-Out Culture So Toxic
Asam Ahmad100,900 views today ·
The Top 100 Documentaries We Can Use to Change the World
Films For Action11,142 views today ·
I Promise, It's Not Lame to Ask a Woman for Permission
Dave Booda10,755 views today ·
John Pilger on ISIS: Only When We See the War Criminals In Our Midst Will the Blood Begin to Dry
John Pilger8,337 views today ·
Caitlin Moran's Posthumous Advice for Her Daughter
Caitlin Moran4,207 views today ·
Paramedic's Response to "Burger Flippers" Making an Equal $15/Hour is Beautiful
Craig Carilli3,213 views today ·
On the Wildness of Children: The Revolution Will Not Take Place In The Classroom
Carol Black2,269 views today ·
Mourning the Manchester Bombing
Abi Wilkinson1,715 views today ·
Jeremy Bernard Corbyn: What Was Done (2017)
33 min1,494 views today ·
Load More
What's Next
Into The Fire (2011)
123 min
There's No Tomorrow (2012)
34 min
The American Dream
29 min
Like us on Facebook?
We're Making a Mistake If We Let a Mass Slaughter Become a Debate about Cartoons