The Mystery of Science
By Olive Dempsey / adbusters.org
Jan 22, 2011

John Todd's work is something of a mystery, even to himself. He and his colleagues build mini-ecosystems that turn sewage into irrigation water, restore dying lakes and streams, filter polluted canals, and process sludge. They call them living machines. They can assemble them. They're just not entirely sure how they work.

Todd is part of a growing legion of scientists who are swinging open the doors of laboratories and pulling up from microscopes to proudly state, "I don't know." They do have some understanding of how an individual creature processes a toxin and which ones are better suited to certain conditions. But ultimately, all they can do is combine them, step back, and watch the magic: the intricate cooperation between snails, grasses and microbes that process the products of our factories, toilets and chemical plants better than we can.

Rebel scientists like Todd recognize the futility in trying to manage, direct or predict nature. They see that, for all our supposed wisdom, we have failed to accomplish the most basic tasks. We cannot live – feed, house or transport ourselves – without destroying our own habitat.

The more closely we study our subject, from molecular biology to genetics, to nanotechnology, the further away we are from understanding the system. But some brave academics are learning to discard the hubris of their disciplines, challenging the claims that all life can be partitioned into quantifiable parts. Rather than trying to disassemble the mysteries of the natural world, they are learning to put them back together, to see the big picture and find their place in the image.

Todd has explained "If we could be half as intelligent as a forest. . . if we could understand how it organizes itself as wood – i.e., how it uses energy and materials and nutrients and relationships – we could reduce the negative human footprint on this planet by 90 percent."

Clearly, it's time to send scientists back to school.

Or, as life sciences writer Janine Benyus puts it, scientists need "to literally change their eyes and their hearts, [to] change the ways they see and feel about the natural world."

What would this change look like? It is "a deepening relationship with an organism," says Benyus. A state in which, "You don't just learn about, you learn from. Out of this process respect and awe ensues. Suddenly you are in a different situation, you are a student. Nature is a wellspring of genius."

4.0 ·
1
Trending Today
A New Browser Plug-In Lets You Access Millions of Scientific Papers for Free
Dom Galeon3,671 views today ·
The Psychology of Narcissism, Explained in This 5 Minute Animated Film
5 min3,610 views today ·
Don't Buy the Lie - To Oppose the Government Is Not Sabotage
2 min2,094 views today ·
How to Hug the Man That Killed Your Wife
Vegar Svanemyr1,568 views today ·
This Painting Captures a Disturbing Truth about the History of Our Education System
2 min1,564 views today ·
When You Kill Ten Million Africans You Aren't Called 'Hitler'
Liam O'Ceallaigh1,515 views today ·
How Sanctuary Cities Actually Work
6 min1,512 views today ·
25 Cheat Sheets for Taking Care of Yourself Like a Damn Adult
Anna Borges1,445 views today ·
The Main Issue in the French Presidential Election: National Sovereignty
Diana Johnstone1,304 views today ·
Load More
What's Next
BBC:  The Power of Nightmares (2004)
180 min
Seeds of Permaculture: If It's Beautiful, It's Better (2013)
88 min
The Witness (2000)
43 min
Like us on Facebook?
The Mystery of Science