The Mother of All Rules Governing US Media: Censor & Cover-Up US Government Criminality
The Mother of All Rules Governing US Media: Censor & Cover-Up US Government Criminality
By Sibel Edmonds / boilingfrogspost.com

In January 2008 The Sunday Times published the second report of its four-part investigative series concerning the U.S. government’s direct role in international terrorism networks and organized crime involving nuclear espionage: For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets .

While the reports received mainstream media coverage internationally-Europe, Asia & Australia, and were widely circulated online, they were completely ignored by the US mainstream media. The US media censored them despite corroboration and confirmation by several high-level current and former US officials, and despite official document(s) further supporting them.

What was contained in these reports? Who was incriminated? The investigative report published by Ceasefire Magazine provides a brief overview:

Five years ago, Edmonds revealed to the Sunday Times that an unidentified senior U.S. State Department official was on the payroll of Turkish agents in Washington, passing on nuclear and military secrets. “He was aiding foreign operatives against U.S. interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives”, Edmonds told the paper.

In the Sunday Times exposé, Edmonds described a parallel organisation in Israel cooperating with the Turks on illegal weapons sales and technology transfers. Between them, Israel and Turkey operated a range of front companies incorporated in the U.S. with active “moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions”, supported by U.S. officials, in order to sell secrets to the highest bidder. One of the buyers was Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) – which often used its Turkish allies, according to the Times, “as a conduit… because they were less likely to attract suspicion.”

How does one go about separating an explosive report such as this from some fiction or wild allegation? The answer is quite easy: the existence of independent and credible witnesses who corroborate the report, and or document(s) supporting the claims. With these ingredients you go from an ‘allegation’ to a ‘credible report.’

Now, let’s check and see if these ingredients for legitimate reporting were present.

In my previous post on the recent exposé by Dr. Nafeez Ahmed at Ceasefire, I highlighted the statements by Times’ two lead journalists that high-level officials had confirmed and corroborated the reports [All Emphasis Mine]:

According to two Sunday Times journalists speaking on condition of anonymity, this and related revelations had been confirmed by senior Pentagon and MI6 officials as part of a four-part investigative series that were supposed to run in 2008. The Sunday Times journalists described how the story was inexplicably dropped under the pressure of undisclosed “interest groups”, which, they suggest, were associated with the U.S. State Department.

Based on my recollection the Times’ had 3 high-level current and former Pentagon officials and one senior MI6 Intelligence Officer who had confirmed and corroborated these reports. However, they had more than that.

My former supervisor at the FBI, the Senior FBI Special Agent in charge of the FBI’s Turkish Counterintelligence Division, had also confirmed these reports. Considering the fact that at the time he was still working for the FBI, despite the enormous risk(s) involved in speaking out on a case considered the most classified in the history of this country, Agent Dennis Saccher found the least risky way to confirm the report:

A journalist with the Sunday Times‘ investigative unit told this author he had interviewed former Special Agent in Charge, Dennis Saccher, who had moved to the FBI’s Colorado office. Saccher reportedly confirmed the veracity of Edmonds’ allegations of espionage, telling him that Edmonds’ story “should have been front page news” because it was “a scandal bigger than Watergate.”

The credence and backing given by Agent Saccher must have been extremely threatening and damaging for the US government since they responded this way:

The same journalist confirmed that after interviewing Saccher at his home, the newspaper was contacted by the U.S. State Department. “The U.S. embassy in London called the editor and tried to ward him off. We were told that we weren’t permitted to approach Saccher or any other active FBI agents directly, but could only go through the FBI’s press office – that if we tried to speak to Saccher or anyone else employed by the FBI directly, that would be illegal. Of course, it isn’t, but that’s what we were told. I think this was a veiled threat.”

Saccher’s comments to the journalist never made it to press.

Let’s add up the number of credible and official witnesses supporting the reports so far – three Pentagon Officials, one Senior MI6 Intelligence Officer, and one Senior FBI Special Agent. That makes … 5 high-level official witnesses. Okay. Now, we have even more.

Right after the first report by the Times another high-level witness came forward and publicly corroborated and confirmed the Times’ report. John M. Cole, an 18-year Counterintelligence and Counterterrorism Manager for the FBI, the official in charge of the FBI counterintelligence unit where I worked, came forward and publicly confirmed what was reported in The Sunday Times’ series:

“I am fully aware of the FBI’s decade-long investigation of” Marc Grossman. Grossman had served as the third-highest ranking official in the Bush State Department and was alleged by Edmonds in the interview, and in a sworn, video-taped deposition a month earlier, to have been the U.S. ringleader for a massive Turkish espionage scandal reaching through the halls of power and into top secret nuclear facilities around the country to the benefit of allies and enemies alike.

Cole said that the FBI’s counterintelligence probe “ultimately was buried and covered up,” and that he believes it is “long past time” for an investigation of the case to “bring about accountability.”

The FBI veteran executive also offered an insider’s account of the panic that ensued inside the highest echelons of the Bureau following Edmonds first disclosure of information in 2002, recounting how an executive assistant director admitted to him at the time, just after the story first broke, “Well, all I know is that everything that Sibel is stating is true. I read her file. Everything she stated is, in fact, accurate.”

Before I go further let me take a break and add up the number of witnesses again- three Pentagon Officials, one Senior MI6 Intelligence Officer, one Senior FBI Special Agent- SA Dennis Saccher, and one Senior FBI Official-SA John M. Cole. That makes … 6 high-level official witnesses.

Now add to all these witnesses an official file as evidence, a damning lie by the DOJ and FBI denying the existence of this official file, and even more damning evidence proving the existence of this file and the US government’s lie.

During their investigation the Times’ reporters had obtained a letter providing further information on this case and naming the FBI file containing  evidence supporting The Sunday Times’ exposé. The reporters contacted the FBI and DOJ to seek comment(s) on this file. The DOJ-FBI flatly denied the existence of this file and its documents; they said the file and documents did not exist. Other journalists and researchers took this further and filed an official request with the DOJ-FBI under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). With the results obtained under the FOIA request the US government was caught red-handed with its on-the-record lie [All Emphasis Mine]:

When the Times asked Edmonds about FBI File 203A-WF-210023, she said, “The file refers to the counterintelligence programme that the Department of Justice has declared to be a state secret to protect sensitive diplomatic relations.” The article goes on to say that, “the FBI responded to a [Liberty Coalition] freedom of information request for a file of exactly the same number by claiming that it did not exist. But The Sunday Times has obtained a document signed by an FBI official showing the existence of the file.” No other information was given regarding the latter document.

January 2011, I submitted a FOIA request for FBI File 203A-WF-210023 and records with references to Tom Lantos, a deceased Congressman (D-CA) featured in Sibel Edmonds’ State Secrets Privilege Gallery (posted in conjunction with the January 6 Times report; click here for names/info). In some of their correspondence regarding my request, the FBI seems to indirectly confirm the existence of the file, such as by saying there were 3429 “potentially responsive” pages, and that “[Lantos] shares the same investigative file.” However, in its final response the FBI refused to confirm or deny the existence of responsive records…

I appealed to the DOJ Office of Information Policy (OIP), and received the March 12, 2012 letter stating that, “All of the information responsive to your request [for records concerning FBI File 203A-WF-210023] is classified.” FBI’s withholding was affirmed on “partly modified grounds”; FOIA exemption (b)(1) is the only one cited, which exempts classified information from disclosure. The letter also says the responsive information is being referred to the DOJ Department Review Committee (DRC) for declassification review.

The March 12 DOJ response is significant for several reasons. One is that it’s the first official public acknowledgment of the existence of FBI File 203A-WF-210023; the DOJ has implicitly acknowledged its existence by stating that the information responsive to my request for this file (and Lantos references) is classified. This official confirmation of the file’s existence gives additional credence to Edmonds’ already credible allegations.

To recap and simplify: The Sunday Times receives an official letter exposing the FBI file that contains documents pertaining to the investigations related to the reports. The FBI-DOJ officially and publicly deny the existence of this file. A couple of years later, when a researcher files a request for information contained in the file with the exact same name-number, the FBI-DOJ respond by indicating how many documents were in this particular file, and that none could be released due to classification. The supposed non-existent file in the FBI is later considered too classified to be released, thus confirming its existence.

Another important ingredient that supports and vindicates the Times’ exposé is the now-exposed pressure by the US government and ‘special interest groups’ to kill the series-for good:

According to two Sunday Times journalists speaking on condition of anonymity, this and related revelations had been confirmed by senior Pentagon and MI6 officials as part of a four-part investigative series that were supposed to run in 2008. The Sunday Times journalists described how the story was inexplicably dropped under the pressure of undisclosed “interest groups”, which, they suggest, were associated with the U.S. State Department.

Now, what do you get if you sum up:

6 credible and high-level government officials corroborating and confirming these reports,

An official letter naming the FBI-DOJ file that contains the documents supporting these reports- the FBI-DOJ lie publicly in denial, and then FOIA documents proving the existence of the classified file in question and the government’s lie to cover it up,

Unprecedented pressure by the US State Department and ‘interest groups’ on The Sunday Times resulting in the abrupt and ‘unexplained’ killing of the series midway.

Okay, now it is your turn dear readers: How could the entire US media censor and blackout a report involving the US government’s criminality despite corroboration by half a dozen credible and high-level officials, documents, witnesses, whistleblowers and gag orders? Why would the US media uniformly shield and protect the government’s criminality involving nuclear smuggling ring(s), participating in international terrorism, and having a close partnership with what they publicly call al-Qaeda all the way until and past 9/11?

The answer should come from you rather than this humble author. And with that answer the responsibility to act and counter what is called the US media today.

# # # #

Sibel Edmonds is the Publisher & Editor of Boiling Frogs Post and the author of the Memoir Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story. She is the recipient of the 2006 PEN Newman’s Own First Amendment Award for her “commitment to preserving the free flow of information in the United States in a time of growing international isolation and increasing government secrecy” Ms. Edmonds has a MA in Public Policy and International Commerce from George Mason University, a BA in Criminal Justice and Psychology from George Washington University.

4.0 ·
2
What's Next
Trending Today
Ten Ways We Misunderstand Children
Jan Hunt · 20,255 views today · 1. We expect children to be able to do things before they are ready. We ask an infant to keep quiet. We ask a 2-year-old to sit still. We ask a 3-year-old to clean his room...
18 Empowering Illustrations to Remind Everyone Who's Really in Charge of Women's Bodies
Julianne Ross · 11,183 views today · When Brazilian graphic designer Carol Rossetti began posting colorful illustrations of women and their stories to Facebook, she had no idea how popular they would...
Beyond Civilization: Humanity's Next Great Adventure
Daniel Quinn · 5,014 views today · PART ONE A fable to start with Once upon a time life evolved on a certain planet, bringing forth many different social organizations—packs, pods, flocks, troops, herds, and...
Lawns Are for Suckers. Plant a Garden - for the Climate!
Nathanael Johnson · 2,215 views today · Ripping out your lawn and planting kale and peppers won’t just lead to great stir-fry — a new study finds it could make major contributions to fighting climate change...
You Should Get Naked More Often. It's Good for You.
Joni Sweet · 1,747 views today · When Nelly encouraged overheated people worldwide to get naked in 2002, he was unknowingly advocating much more than just a sexy, sweaty dance party. Sunbathing, sleeping...
How Native Americans Managed "Wild" Land Long Before Settlers
Sami Grover · 1,520 views today · When European settlers first came to North America, they assumed they were looking at "untouched" nature. Sure, there were native peoples, but history tells us they didn't...
Solidarity Is About What You Do - Not Who You Are.
R.L. Stephens · 1,157 views today · I am Black. I capitalize Black and leave white lowercased. Sure, it’s the accepted spelling, but really I do it because it feels good. My family lived in Missouri, but my...
John Lennon's "Imagine," Made Into a Comic Strip
John Lennon. Art by Pablo Stanley · 1,018 views today · This is easily the best comic strip ever made.  Pabl
Bioregional Quiz: How Well Do You Know the Place in Which You Live?
Rua Lupa · 852 views today · In the vast emptiness of space there are an unimaginable number of galaxies, each galaxy containing billions upon billions of stars. Looking at one galaxy we find an average...
A New Story for Humanity (2016)
102 min · 772 views today · Inspired by the New Story Summit at the Findhorn Foundation: a sold-out multicultural, multigenerational inquiry into a new story for humanity, attended by change makers and...
Masculinity Is Killing Men: The Roots of Men and Trauma
Kali Holloway · 678 views today · We begin the damaging process of turning boys into men long before boyhood ends.
The White Man in That Photo
Riccardo Gazzaniga · 630 views today · Sometimes photographs deceive. Take this one, for example. It represents John Carlos and Tommie Smith’s rebellious gesture the day they won medals for the 200 meters at the...
Gabor Maté: Why Our Culture Makes So Many Of Us Unhappy
3 min · 609 views today · Dr. Gabor Maté explains why it is that our culture makes so many of us unhappy, unkind to one another, miserable, alienated from ourselves, etc. Watch the full interview in Part 2.
It Didn't Start With You: How Inherited Family Trauma Shapes Who We Are
Mark Wolynn · 565 views today · The past is never dead. It’s not even past. — William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun
Schooling the World (2010)
66 min · 541 views today · If you wanted to change an ancient culture in a generation, how would you do it? You would change the way it educates its children. The U.S. Government knew this in the 19th...
Your Lifestyle Has Already Been Designed (The Real Reason For The Forty-Hour Workweek)
David Cain · 539 views today · Well I’m in the working world again. I’ve found myself a well-paying gig in the engineering industry, and life finally feels like it’s returning to normal after my nine months...
When You Kill Ten Million Africans You Aren't Called 'Hitler'
Liam O'Ceallaigh · 524 views today · Take a look at this picture. Do you know who it is? Most people haven’t heard of him. But you should have. When you see his face or hear his name you should get as sick in...
Why You Should Take Your Kids Out of School
Ben Hewitt · 502 views today · We don't need no education. At least not of the traditional, compulsory, watch-the-clock-until-the-bell-rings kind. As a growing movement of unschoolers believe, a steady diet...
Something Extraordinary Is Happening in the World, And Most People Haven't Noticed
Gustavo Tanaka · 406 views today · Most of us haven't quite realized there is something extraordinary happening. A few months ago, I freed myself from standard-procedure society. I broke the chains of fear that...
Why People's Opinions of You Aren't Real
4 min · 381 views today · "You are what you love and not what loves you." - From Charlie Kaufman's film "Adaptation"
Load More
Like us on Facebook?
The Mother of All Rules Governing US Media: Censor & Cover-Up US Government Criminality