The Matrix Broke This Week and an actual Yemeni was Allowed to Testify about Drones in the Senate
By John Glaser / news.antiwar.com
Apr 25, 2013

The Obama administration’s drone war in Yemen “terrorizes” the local population, kills civilians regularly, and helps al-Qaeda recruit new members by sowing anti-American sentiment, according to testimony from a Yemeni activist in a Senate hearing on Tuesday.

“Just six days ago, my village was struck by a drone, in an attack that terrified thousands of simple, poor farmers,” Farea Al-Muslimi told the Senate Judiciary Committee in a hearing on the legality of the drone war. “The drone strike and its impact tore my heart, much as the tragic bombings in Boston last week tore your hearts and also mine.”

“What radicals had previously failed to achieve in my village,” al-Muslimi said, “one drone strike accomplished in an instant: there is now an intense anger and growing hatred of America,” adding that he has ”seen Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula use US strikes to promote its agenda and try to recruit more terrorists.”

Rosa Brooks, Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center, told the Senate that the Obama administration’s drone war undermines the rule of law.

“When a government claims for itself the unreviewable power to kill anyone, anywhere on earth, at any time, based on secret criteria and secret information discussed in a secret process by largely unnamed individuals, it undermines the rule of law,” Brooks said.

Brooks also cited the Justice Department’s leaked memo on targeted killings, reminding the committee that the Obama administration’s novel conception of an “imminent” threat of attack – a required stipulation for the use of force abroad – “seems, in itself, like a substantial departure from accepted international law definitions of imminence. ”

The leaked legal memo refers to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than what has traditionally been required, like actual intelligence of an ongoing plot against the US.

“The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.

“That concept of imminence has been called Orwellian, and although that is an overused epithet, in this context it seems fairly appropriate,” Brooks said.

3.5 ·
1
Trending Today
This Impassioned Post by a Charlottesville Resident Sets The Record Straight
Lisa Moore3,541 views today ·
Today I Rise: This Beautiful Short Film Is Like a Love Poem For Your Heart and Soul
4 min3,020 views today ·
White Supremacists Get Trolled by Clown Protesters
2 min2,277 views today ·
From Westminster to Washington, Instability is All Around
2 min1,869 views today ·
Arnold Schwarzenegger Delivers a Powerful Message to Neo-Nazis After Charlottesville
4 min1,114 views today ·
Peter Joseph & Abby Martin on Abolishing Capitalism
45 min629 views today ·
This Chilling Charlottesville Doc Should Be Required Viewing for all Americans
22 min493 views today ·
This Facebook Comment About the UK Election Is Going Viral
Chris Renwick420 views today ·
90 Inspiring, Visionary Films That Will Change How You See the World in Profound Ways
Tim Hjersted392 views today ·
Load More
Join us on Facebook
The Matrix Broke This Week and an actual Yemeni was Allowed to Testify about Drones in the Senate