The Matrix Broke This Week and an actual Yemeni was Allowed to Testify about Drones in the Senate
By John Glaser / news.antiwar.com
Apr 25, 2013

The Obama administration’s drone war in Yemen “terrorizes” the local population, kills civilians regularly, and helps al-Qaeda recruit new members by sowing anti-American sentiment, according to testimony from a Yemeni activist in a Senate hearing on Tuesday.

“Just six days ago, my village was struck by a drone, in an attack that terrified thousands of simple, poor farmers,” Farea Al-Muslimi told the Senate Judiciary Committee in a hearing on the legality of the drone war. “The drone strike and its impact tore my heart, much as the tragic bombings in Boston last week tore your hearts and also mine.”

“What radicals had previously failed to achieve in my village,” al-Muslimi said, “one drone strike accomplished in an instant: there is now an intense anger and growing hatred of America,” adding that he has ”seen Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula use US strikes to promote its agenda and try to recruit more terrorists.”

Rosa Brooks, Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center, told the Senate that the Obama administration’s drone war undermines the rule of law.

“When a government claims for itself the unreviewable power to kill anyone, anywhere on earth, at any time, based on secret criteria and secret information discussed in a secret process by largely unnamed individuals, it undermines the rule of law,” Brooks said.

Brooks also cited the Justice Department’s leaked memo on targeted killings, reminding the committee that the Obama administration’s novel conception of an “imminent” threat of attack – a required stipulation for the use of force abroad – “seems, in itself, like a substantial departure from accepted international law definitions of imminence. ”

The leaked legal memo refers to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than what has traditionally been required, like actual intelligence of an ongoing plot against the US.

“The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.

“That concept of imminence has been called Orwellian, and although that is an overused epithet, in this context it seems fairly appropriate,” Brooks said.

3.5 ·
1
Trending Today
87 Deeply Subversive Documentaries That Challenge the Status Quo
Films For Action4,704 views today ·
How Modern Imperialism Creates Famine Around the World
Eric Draitser2,856 views today ·
Joanna Macy on How to Prepare Internally for WHATEVER Comes Next
Joanna Macy2,310 views today ·
The White Man in That Photo
Riccardo Gazzaniga1,483 views today ·
The Human Future Depends On All of Us Becoming Designers
Daniel Quinn1,470 views today ·
How Swedes and Norwegians Broke the Power of the ‘1 Percent’
George Lakey1,354 views today ·
Your Lifestyle Has Already Been Designed (The Real Reason For The Forty-Hour Workweek)
David Cain1,058 views today ·
America’s Trump, Not Trump’s America
Frank Scott852 views today ·
This Facebook Comment About the UK Election Is Going Viral
Chris Renwick804 views today ·
Load More
What's Next
Lolita: Slave to Entertainment (2013)
58 min
Locally Abundant (2012)
74 min
Europe Or Die (2015)
100 min
Like us on Facebook?
The Matrix Broke This Week and an actual Yemeni was Allowed to Testify about Drones in the Senate