Lawrence, KS - Events Local News Groups Contact
Chicken Prohibition Favored by Some, Opposed by Others
By Indy Media / filmsforaction.org
Jun 10, 2008
By Michael Almon - Sustainability Action Network, Lawrence, KS

Midge Grinstead of the Lawrence Humane Society has made a formal request to the city to END the raising of chickens in the city, ostensibly because of Zoonotic diseases (e.g. Avian Flu) that transmit from animals to humans. The hearing will be on a future City Commission agenda, date unspecified.

Unfortunately, this matter falls on two sides of the sustainability issue. In response to Peak Oil and climate change, the emerging relocalization movement is creating local networks to provide local energy, health care, transportation, food, water supplies, etc. This is because local production is generally more energy efficient, less mechanized, has a smaller carbon footprint, and a greater economic multiplier effect. All of these enrich the local populace and culture.

However, for similar reasons, others are promoting vegetarianism and veganism to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This is because ten time more grains are required for a meat based diet than for a vegetarian diet, a huge energy waste for crop production, and the large ruminants and swine produce quantities of methane gas causing global warming, as well as cause vast rainforest clearing for pasture.


But as this reporter considers it, these assumptions don't seem to apply to chickens. The rainforest is not cleared for chicken grazing, and as backyard chickens, their diet is less grain than greens and bugs. In addition, it is a known fact that avian flu can be traced to the explosion of intensive industrial poultry production in Southeast Asia and the developing world in general (Michael Greger, MD; Satya Magazine, February 2006)

It is a safe assumption that any sustainability advocate would find industrial agriculture in ANY form to be ecologically non-sustainable - feedlot animals, mechanized or GMO crops, caged poultry, farmed salmon, etc. All of these share the characteristics of large energy inputs and carbon footprints, low quality feed and the resulting meat, high levels of pollution, and unhealthy facilities for both laborers and animals. But avoiding these factors is the very reason so many folks are embarking on raising their own chickens, and also to provide less expensive food for their families. In the balance of things, it hardly seems wise to curtail civil liberties when many folks are trying to avoid increasingly expensive and unhealthy industrial foods.



To subscribe to the Sustainability Action Network's weekly announcement list, send an e-mail to paradigm@ixks.com with the subject line reading “subscribe”.
0.0 ·
0

Support Films For Action

Films For Action empowers citizens with the information they need to help create a more just, sustainable, and democratic society.

We receive no government or corporate funding and rely on our supporters to keep us going. Donate today.

Trending Today
After Living in Norway, America Feels Backward. Here's Why.
Ann Jones8,380 views today ·
Capitalism Killing You? Income Sharing Could Save Our Lives
Matt Stannard5,297 views today ·
Why You Should Take Your Kids Out of School
Ben Hewitt2,616 views today ·
The White Man in That Photo
Riccardo Gazzaniga2,381 views today ·
It Didn't Start With You: How Inherited Family Trauma Shapes Who We Are
Mark Wolynn1,777 views today ·
How Swedes and Norwegians Broke the Power of the ‘1 Percent’
George Lakey1,118 views today ·
18 Empowering Illustrations to Remind Everyone Who's Really in Charge of Women's Bodies
Julianne Ross1,013 views today ·
This Facebook Comment About the UK Election Is Going Viral
Chris Renwick1,013 views today ·
Dreaming Beyond Capitalism: a Culture Without Fear
Martin Winiecki727 views today ·
Load More
Join us on Facebook
Chicken Prohibition Favored by Some, Opposed by Others