Charlie Hebdo: We Must Grieve the Dead Without Misconstruing Racism as Democratic Ideal
Charlie Hebdo: We Must Grieve the Dead Without Misconstruing Racism as Democratic Ideal
By Christen A. Smith / truth-out.org
Jan 9, 2015

The recent attack on the headquarters of the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo was devastating, underscoring violent times under the treacherous shadow of terrorism. We must take care not to lace our grief with hate, vengeance and more violence by misconstruing our racism as our democracy.

Simply put: Political cartoons are free speech, but they are not always innocent and inherently democratic. Although Charlie Hebdo's satirical cartoons are directed at a broad swath of people and political issues, we cannot dismiss the historical relationship between racist caricature and racist violence. To do that, I dare say, would be to undermine the very spirit of healthy debate and controversy Charlie Hebdo upholds.

Indeed, this attack is a painful reminder that moments like these often spiral democratic nations into racist tirades of animosity and revenge fomented by xenophobia, in this case, painting all Muslims as terrorists.

In fact, anti-Islam sentiment has been on the rise across Europe. Shortly after the attacks, conservative French politician Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front party, predictably blamed Islam for the murderous rampage. However, as the day 's events progressed, even the most liberal pundits allowed their grief to slip into anti-Muslim sentiment. The Washington Post decided to republish one of Charlie Hebdo's controversial cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed.

Charlie Hebdo is a controversial magazine by any assessment. Its satirical cartoons characterize its polemical nature and have poked fun at a host of religions over the years, not just Islam. Yet few have been talking about the racism of many of the magazine's cartoons and how they provocatively push the boundaries between free speech and prejudice.

Political cartoons are clearly one of our democratic rights. They are, however, also one of the primary media of racism often employed in tense political times. Take for example a cartoon that circulated on a Democratic Party flyer during the 1866 Pennsylvania congressional and gubernatorial campaign in the United States. The19th century cartoon was used as propaganda against The Freedman's Bureau, a policy aspect of Reconstruction designed to integrate African Americans into mainstream society after legal abolition.

As social media took up the hashtag #JeSuisCharlie in solidarity with Charlie Hebdo, a smaller voice of grief and dissent also emerged: #JeNeSuisPasCharlie - a hashtag that acknowledged the senselessness of the violence involved with the case but also refused to dismiss the history of the magazine 's racism.

Many of Charlie Hebdo's most controversial cartoons have not only been directed against Muslims. They have also been directed against black people, particularly women, like the Nigerian girls abducted by Boko Haram. We can condemn the violence against Charlie Hebdo without condoning the racism they often reproduce.

Cultural studies scholar Stuart Hall reminds us that images and caricature have a long, intertwined relationship with colonialism, slavery and prejudice across the Atlantic world. All caricature is not created equal. Some of it, when mobilized alongside legacies of race, gender, sexuality, class and yes, even religious discrimination, can reproduce uneven power dynamics that have a negative effects on marginalized people. The racist cartoons of African Americans that circulated widely in the United States in the 19th century were by many accounts a precursor for lynching. See, for example, Marlon Rigg 's documentary Ethnic Notions

In 2013, the editor of Stéphane Charbonnier, affectionately known as "Carb," who was killed in the attack, wrote a brief essay defending the weekly against accusations of racism,

"Charlie, our Charlie Hebdo, is feeling decidedly ill. Because an unbelievable lie is going around, among more and more people, and we hear it every day. According to them, Charlie Hebdo has become a racist sheet."

He goes on to note that "antiracism and a passion for equality among all people are and continue to be the founding principles of Charlie Hebdo. "

But that is just it. The conversation was not over. By killing Carb and the other nine journalists at Charlie Hebdo, the assassins truncated our ability to continue the debate. That is where the tragedy lies, not in the extent to which we should be free to produce any kind of racist cartoon we like without thinking about the political and emotional impact it might have.

We had more to debate, more to discuss, and Carb should be here to answer.

Christen A. Smith is assistant professor of African and African diaspora studies and anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin. Her forthcoming book, Afro-Paradise: The Black Body, Violence and Performance in Brazil, analyzes anti-black state violence and the black Brazilian community's response to it. She is a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project. Follow her on Twitter @profsassy.

Copyright, Truthout. Reprinted with permission.

4.0 ·
1
Trending Today
Bertrand Russell & Buckminster Fuller on Why We Should Work Less, and Live & Learn More
Josh Jones19,933 views today ·
The Venus Project Plans to Bring Humanity to the Next Stage of Social Evolution. Here's How.
Daniel Araya with Roxanne Meadows10,022 views today ·
7 Signs of Tyranny
2 min9,330 views today ·
4.1 Miles
21 min7,272 views today ·
Forget Shorter Showers: Why Personal Change Does Not Equal Political Change (2015)
11 min7,255 views today ·
The Trump Report - The Real Fake News About The Dakota Access Pipeline
2 min5,519 views today ·
What It Takes to Change Hearts and Minds
Colin Beavan3,690 views today ·
The Choice Between Fear And Love
5 min3,282 views today ·
Why Would Any of Us Want to Live like a Savage?
Juan Pablo Quinonez1,974 views today ·
How Independent is Hollywood?
4 min1,758 views today ·
Touch Isolation: How Homophobia Has Robbed All Men Of Touch
Mark Greene1,417 views today ·
How a Lack of Touch Is Destroying Men
Mark Green1,037 views today ·
Load More
New
Chris Hedges & Abby Martin - Trump, Fascism & the Christian Right
26 min
4.1 Miles
21 min
7 Signs of Tyranny
2 min
How to Be a Great Listener
5 min
DAPL Opponents Vow to 'Rise' From Ashes of Oceti Sakowin and Keep Fighting
Lauren McCauley
Those That Did Not Seek Revenge
Dr. Ann Russo
MLK Stands With Standing Rock (#NoDAPL)
3 min
Michael Moore Wants to Help You Find Your Next Anti-Trump Protest
Sarah Ruiz-Grossman
Saramurillo, Justice for Peru's Amazonian Peoples?
9 min
Globalization Makes No Sense
Chris Agnos
From Sanctuary City to Liberated City
Frank Lara
The London Anarchist Group Squatting Mansions to Fight Homelessness
6 min
Load More
What's Next
Noam Chomsky: US The Leading Terrorist State
Noam Chomsky
Chris Hedges: Why Israel Lies
Chris Hedges
What If the Emperor Had No Soldiers? Re-thinking: "Support the Troops"
Mickey Z.
Like us on Facebook?
Charlie Hebdo: We Must Grieve the Dead Without Misconstruing Racism as Democratic Ideal